MPI STACK SMASHING DETECTED C++ FULL
MPI STACK SMASHING DETECTED C++ CODE

However, my problem is that I can never get the tests in test/run_test.sh to pass. IвЂ™m cloning the repo and running python setup.py develop inside a designated anaconda environment. Of course, I am not so arrogant as to think therefore that nothing could *possibly* be wrong with it.I have been trying to get a PyTorch version built from source which I can use for contributing for quite a while now. I'd like to point out though that one of my other functions which instantiates a crystal_packet also uses crystal_get(), and I've tested it fairly vigorously since it is functioning as the heart and soul of input from the device.

MPI STACK SMASHING DETECTED C++ FULL

It's passed a crystal_packet by reference in which to store any complete packet received from the device, and it also gives back, as the function return value, a boolean indicating whether or not a full and good packet came in. Maybe you are accessing the array out of bounds But it doesn't seem to make it back from the function to continue with main(). Let me point out again that it doesn't seem to happen until the return statement - if I put a 'printf('Made it here ') ' immediately before the return instruction, that printf is carried out. Yes, this is exactly the problematic code. If anyone can provide any help or insight it would be much appreciated. Why can I not instantiate one on the stack of this function in particular? *They* instantiate crystal_packets on *their* stacks without a complaint.and I can run them as many times as I want! But a single call to crystal_keystroke() and everything explodes. Why shouldn't I be able to do it that way? An additional bit of intrigue: I already have a *lot* of other functions, separate from main, that I'm using the same way as I'm trying to use crystal_keystroke(), that I've concocted for interfacing with the device in various ways.

MPI STACK SMASHING DETECTED C++ CODE

The only thing I am trying to do differently from that is to instantiate the crystal_packet struct on crystal_keystroke's stack instead of main's stack, so that I don't have to keep a struct in memory on main's stack that I'm not using most of the time (and make main's code a bit bulkier). Int keystroke = crystal_packet(response) Oddly (in my perception), I discovered that if I instantiate the crystal_packet struct on main's stack instead of on crystal_keystroke's stack, and pass it by reference to crystal_keystroke, everything works dandily. Apparently it has to do with addressing memory illegally (similar to a segfault, but somehow different), but I don't see any way I'm doing that. I've read a little bit about what this means but I don't quite understand it, or why it's happening here. The problem is that if I try to put this *exact* same code into a separate function called crystal_keystroke(), change the last line to return response.data as the result, and call 'int keypress = crystal_keystroke()' from main, the program craps out with a backtrace and the complaint 'Stack smashing detected.' This seems to occur on the 'return' line of crystal_keystroke().

Now, this code works without a hitch *if* it's sitting right in main(). Most of this snippet isn't relevant to my problem - it's just the logistics of communicating with the device - suffice it to say that at the end of this snippet, a key on the CrystalFontz has been pressed and 'keypress' contains an indicator telling me which one. If (!crystal_get(response)) response.type = 0

Mpi stack smashing detected c++